top of page
Search

Just How Divided are We?

  • Writer: Chris Bail
    Chris Bail
  • May 9, 2019
  • 2 min read

As the Trump Administration continues to square off with house democrats regarding the release of the full Mueller report, it can seem as though America is as divided as ever. Interestingly, however, the American National Election Study-- the largest study of American public opinion, political behavior, and voting intentions-- asks a series of questions each year designed to measure how ordinary Americans think of a range of different people and groups.


I produced the figure above using the latest data available: the 2018 Pilot of the American National Election study, which asked thousands of Republicans, Democrats, and unaffiliated people what they think about a range of people and groups in government and civil society-- as well as a range of different ethnic and minority groups.


Each person who takes the survey is asked to rate a person or group using a "Thermometer scale" that ranges from "0" to "100" (low scores mean the respondent feels "cold" towards the group and high scores mean the respondent feels "warm" about them).


As the figure above shows, the most divisive figures among Democrats and Republicans are clearly Donald Trump and Barack Obama-- no big surprises there. Kavanaugh and Mueller are also highly divisive, alongside journalists, socialists, rural Americans, and Muslims.


At the same time, the data show some room for hope: Americans have fairly consistent views about the FBI, the Police, African Americans, Asians, Hispanics, Whites, and to some extent, immigrants and LGBT people.


The take-home message for me is that too much of our politics focused on a small group of highly divisive elites. The danger, as so much social science theory teaches us, is that such elites can be easily confused with the masses. This process is accelerated by social media, of course.


Some clues about how to move forward lie in recent advances in social science research. Correcting misperceptions about rival political parties-- and even the extent of political polarization itself-- is one of the few interventions that social scientists have attempted that seem to lessen animosity between Republicans and Democrats. Now the important question is: how can we scale this?



 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

3 Comments


bentiecesav.a.ge54.62
Aug 08

Mình cũng hay xem mấy kèo cầu cho vui và để tham khảo thôi, chứ không bao giờ dám đặt niềm tin tuyệt đối vì xổ số lúc trúng lúc trật khó lường. Theo mình, quan trọng là biết chọn lọc nguồn và giữ bình tĩnh, đừng để cảm xúc kéo đi. Có thời gian mình tự ghi lại vài dạng cầu thường gặp, theo dõi xem nó có lặp không, rồi đặt sẵn mức dừng để khỏi sa đà, thấy hiệu quả hơn hẳn kiểu đánh theo linh cảm. Mình thích những bài viết nói rõ lý do chọn hướng nào, chứ không chỉ thả một con số. Đọc các chia sẻ về Soi cầu tốt mình cũng hiểu…

Like

Sam Dillard
Sam Dillard
Jul 06

The combination of smooth 3D graphics, fast-paced gameplay, and simple controls makes Snow Rider 3D an enjoyable experience for players of all ages.

Like

Miller Jack
Miller Jack
Mar 24

Chris Bail’s emphasis on “social sampling bias” within online political networks highlights a methodological challenge increasingly relevant to Australian education researchers studying digital citizenship. His finding that exposure to extreme views does not necessarily create moderation complicates common assumptions used in classroom media-literacy models. These insights reinforce the need for robust research benchmarks similar to those advanced by New Assignment Help when evaluating student engagement with polarised content. The article prompted me to reflect on how universities might redesign digital literacy curricula to better analyse algorithmic influence. I am also curious whether future interdisciplinary courses could merge sociology political science and computational data analysis to help students map division more accurately.

Like
bottom of page